- The politics of the American Clean Energy and Security Act from Grist: “In the exact center, according to recent work by two economists, are nine lawmakers. And if the Waxman-Markey climate bill receives a full House vote, any one of them could provide the 218th “yes”—the decisive vote that passes the bill.”
- Can’t afford a hybrid? Paint your roof white, from Climate Progress.
- How global warming makes storms more dangerous, parts one and two. (Also from Climate Progress).
- Bai Kin-moon addresses the World Business Summit on Climate Change via Grist
- Oil keeps going up and up from Environmental Capital.
- The challenges of building wind turbines in China... sound a lot like the challenges of doing business in China.
- Robert Stavins from the Energy Collective, writing about how political giveaways in Waxman-Markey might affect the effectiveness of cap and trade: Despite all the hand-wringing in the press and the blogosphere about a political “give-away” of allowances for the cap-and-trade system in the Waxman-Markey bill voted out of committee last week, the politics of cap-and-trade systems are truly quite wonderful, which is why these systems have been used, and used successfully.
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Saturday Bullets
Posted by James Edward Dillard at 8:43 AM 0 comments
Labels: cap and trade, China, price of oil, sustainabilityplans, Waxman-Markey
Friday, May 8, 2009
Pittsburgh's North Shore Connector not among the projects receiving the latest Federal Stimulus grants
Hopefully this is the last time I have to bash the North Shore Connector, or the "Bore to the Shore", as the Port Authority refers to it as. Anyone familiar with the Port Authority's North Shore Connector project shouldn't be shocked that it wasn't among the recipients of the latest round of $742 million in Federal Stimulus grants awarded by the U.S. Department of Transportation. The NSC needs roughly an additional $60 million to complete what was supposed to be a $430 million project, bringing the total cost to around $550 million. The project, once completed, will extend our light rail from downtown and under the Allegheny River to the city's North Shore. The new extension will not touch any residential neighborhoods and will most likely be used primarily to transport people going to Steelers and Pirates games, and eventually the new Casino, from downtown and the South Hills.
The project, in the minds of most people with at least half a brain (Former Mayor Tom Murphy still thinks it was a good idea), is not only a misuse of taxpayer dollars - it is a poster child of boondoggle projects that are thought up by politicians, special interests groups, and businesses (like the Pittsburgh Steelers) that do not add value to the greater public. The real need here in Pittsburgh, for years, has been the Oakland to Downtown light rail link. That project would have not only increased ridership, reduced congestion, and led to more economic development in the uptown area- it would have received a bigger part of the Federal Stimulus dollars that are currently being granted to light rail projects in Virginia (Dulles Airport link to DC Metro), Phoenix, and Denver, and even Utah. Yes, even Utah is building light rail that actually touches neighborhoods where people live.
Posted by Schultz at 12:14 PM 7 comments
Labels: Government, Pittsburgh, Rail, Transportation